Back in April, I took a futuristic look back as the price of gasoline from the vantage point of April 2009.  The point was to suggest how the price of a gallon of gas got to $7.33.  In that post, I wrote:

“July 2006 There was general outrage at the pump and on the airwaves, when Americans hit the road for the July 4th weekend paying an average of $3.60 a gallon. The Bush administration tried to channel this anger into getting public opinion around opening up Alaska and other places for the drilling of oil. It was reported that major auto dealerships had an average of a five month supply of SUVs and large pick-up trucks on their lots, the greatest inventory backlog ever.”

Fortunately for all our pocketbooks I was wrong on the high side.  According to the United States Department of Energy, the national average price for a gallon of regular was $2.93 for the July 4th weekend.  In a number of states the average price was over $3.00, with California being the highest at $3.19.  In Chicago where I live, the price in the city seemed to be around $3.20 for regular and  $3.35 – $3.49 for high octane.  All of these numbers are roughly $.75 more per gallon than a year ago, or roughly an increase of 30%, which is a huge one year jump.

The other part of the prediction seems to be close to the truth.  It is impossible to see a newspaper, or watch TV without seeing some sort of huge rebate plan for purchasing a new SUV.  Who wants them when gas is this high?  Time to look at changing your product lines Detroit.

What about my prediction that gas will be over $7.00 a gallon in 2009?  I think it is still quite valid.  If you take the 30% increase year to year and project forward, then the average price of a gallon of regular in 2009 would be $6.37, with premium over $7.00.  Why would the price continue to go up at that rate?  Because of several things that are certain to occur in the years ahead:  China’s continuing and growing voracious appetite for energy, tropical storm damage to the drilling and production infrastructure of the petroleum industry and price destabilization due to terrorism and unstable political situations in oil exporting countries.  Finally, I agree with a number of petroleum experts that we are passing through ‘peak oil’ right now.  Peak oil is simply when we have extracted 50% of all oil in the earth.  This means that we only have 50% of oil left.  When you compare world wide consumption levels of today with those over the past 100 years when we used the first 50% of oil, it becomes clear that we have only decades of oil left.  When this market reality becomes clear to all, then the conserving of the remaining reserves in the world will begin, putting a powerful upward pressure on pricing.

Repeat after me many times:  alternative energy sources, renewable sources of energy, energy efficiency………

Finally, I once recommended a great book on this subject in a prior post.  It is James Howard Kunstler’s “The Long Emergency: Surviving the Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-First Century”  If you are someone who does not believe that innovation on alternative energy will get ahead of the petroleum consumption curve then read this book for a glimpse at  what America will be like in the decades ahead.  And you think life and commuting in exurbia is a pain now, just wait!
 

4 Responses to “Fortunately, an Incorrect Prediction”

  1. Dave Kustin Says:

    Mad Max is coming….

  2. Martin Tibbitts Says:

    I know it is popular to agree with Kristof these days but I believe that sustained high gasoline prices are crucial to ridding us of our oil addiction.

    Give entrepreneurs motivation to invest in high-energy batteries, switchgrass ethanol and biodiesel and we will find a way to power our vehicles without worrying that we are funding terrorism.

    The worst they that could happen now would be for unleaded to fall to $2.

    Martin Tibbitts

  3. david Says:

    In an odd way I agree with both comments above. I wish everyone would watch the Mad Max movies to realize where our ‘Asleep at the Wheel’ car culture might be leading us.

    I completely agree with Martin’s comments. The price of gasoline staying over $3 a gallon is essential for entrepreneurs to create alternative fuel options. In fact, I would support the position John Anderson took during his 1980 run for the Presidency when he recommended a gas tax to stimulate conservation and take all the proceeds of that tax to fund Social Security.

    If the high price of gasoline can make Americans think twice about their driving habits and what car to buy it will be most beneficial all the way around. The best way to fight terrorism is to be able to say no to the purchase of oil at all. But that is my pipe dream.

  4. Richard Holcomb Says:

    Wish Jimmy Carter had taken care of this back in the ’70’s when the gas issue first raised its ugly head. The auto and gas folks have had their day. It’s time we get real. And it’s time we understand China isn’t going to get real. Bring on the innovators and start to offer some serious financial rewards to those willing to step up to the plate and resolve our oil dependence. Certainly there are entreprenaurs that deserve the attention our federal funding czars. Not to mention what would happen if the “Big Three + Two” would put their collective heads together for the sake of change. This, of course, would probably eliminate…or close to eliminate…the dependence we have on our middle eastern friends!

    Richard