<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Driving Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2009/04/15/driving-hydrogen-fuel-cell-vehicles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2009/04/15/driving-hydrogen-fuel-cell-vehicles/</link>
	<description>A Future Look at Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:38:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Stremsky</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2009/04/15/driving-hydrogen-fuel-cell-vehicles/comment-page-1/#comment-65621</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Stremsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/?p=338#comment-65621</guid>
		<description>Great post.

http://www.odemagazine.com/doc/62/japanese-fuel-cell has

&quot;Hydrogen in every home&quot; by Winifred Bird

I discuss dealing with the financial crisis and other topics on

http://sites.google.com/site/kenstremsky/Home/global-thinking-expanded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.odemagazine.com/doc/62/japanese-fuel-cell" rel="nofollow">http://www.odemagazine.com/doc/62/japanese-fuel-cell</a> has</p>
<p>&#8220;Hydrogen in every home&#8221; by Winifred Bird</p>
<p>I discuss dealing with the financial crisis and other topics on</p>
<p><a href="http://sites.google.com/site/kenstremsky/Home/global-thinking-expanded" rel="nofollow">http://sites.google.com/site/kenstremsky/Home/global-thinking-expanded</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roddy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2009/04/15/driving-hydrogen-fuel-cell-vehicles/comment-page-1/#comment-65614</link>
		<dc:creator>Roddy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/?p=338#comment-65614</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve hit on one of the most important issues of our time, and before our country.  We are a bit short on extra funds at the moment, but I would love to see a Manhattan-like Project to do what you say. For five reasons, we should be investing in this future, because the returns would be enormous:
1. Technology - we should be a leader in developing this IP so we can have...
2. Jobs - a strong technological lead in this area could help create hundreds, if not thousands of new jobs.
3. Energy Independence - it&#039;s time to do what those beautiful BP, Exxon and Chevron advertisements claim they&#039;re working on. I&#039;d love to see the Obama Administration call on them to help make visible investments in our nation&#039;s energy infrastructure. Why do we give the oil companies a pass, and blame the car companies? Like Bob Lutz said, it&#039;s like blaming our collective obesity on the clothing manufacturers.
4. Environment - tailpipe emissions could be just water. It doesn&#039;t eliminate the carbon emissions in the total scheme of things, but it&#039;s a huge step in the right direction.
5. National Security - while there still would be humanitarian issues to address, at least we wouldn&#039;t be fighting wars over oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve hit on one of the most important issues of our time, and before our country.  We are a bit short on extra funds at the moment, but I would love to see a Manhattan-like Project to do what you say. For five reasons, we should be investing in this future, because the returns would be enormous:<br />
1. Technology &#8211; we should be a leader in developing this IP so we can have&#8230;<br />
2. Jobs &#8211; a strong technological lead in this area could help create hundreds, if not thousands of new jobs.<br />
3. Energy Independence &#8211; it&#8217;s time to do what those beautiful BP, Exxon and Chevron advertisements claim they&#8217;re working on. I&#8217;d love to see the Obama Administration call on them to help make visible investments in our nation&#8217;s energy infrastructure. Why do we give the oil companies a pass, and blame the car companies? Like Bob Lutz said, it&#8217;s like blaming our collective obesity on the clothing manufacturers.<br />
4. Environment &#8211; tailpipe emissions could be just water. It doesn&#8217;t eliminate the carbon emissions in the total scheme of things, but it&#8217;s a huge step in the right direction.<br />
5. National Security &#8211; while there still would be humanitarian issues to address, at least we wouldn&#8217;t be fighting wars over oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2009/04/15/driving-hydrogen-fuel-cell-vehicles/comment-page-1/#comment-65608</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/?p=338#comment-65608</guid>
		<description>Jack-

Unless the federal government steps in as I have suggested, it will be a very slow growth, not reaching early stage noticeable scale until 2015 at the earliest.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack-</p>
<p>Unless the federal government steps in as I have suggested, it will be a very slow growth, not reaching early stage noticeable scale until 2015 at the earliest.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Altschuler</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2009/04/15/driving-hydrogen-fuel-cell-vehicles/comment-page-1/#comment-65607</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Altschuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/?p=338#comment-65607</guid>
		<description>Following Karl&#039;s comment, after your last post I spent a few minutes poking around the internet looking for information about what happens upstream of hydrogen being in the tank to feed a fuel cell.  

I recall comments a few years ago about the pollution and waste that is created isolating hydrogen and think that I read that the BTU of hydrogen produced is less than the BTU input requirement - that it&#039;s like ethanol, which takes 85,000 BTU&#039;s input to produce a gallon of ethanol with only 75,000 BTU&#039;s in it.  What can you tell us about the hydrogen energy input requirement (is it upside down like ethanol?) and what pollution is created in generating a unit of hydrogen for cars?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following Karl&#8217;s comment, after your last post I spent a few minutes poking around the internet looking for information about what happens upstream of hydrogen being in the tank to feed a fuel cell.  </p>
<p>I recall comments a few years ago about the pollution and waste that is created isolating hydrogen and think that I read that the BTU of hydrogen produced is less than the BTU input requirement &#8211; that it&#8217;s like ethanol, which takes 85,000 BTU&#8217;s input to produce a gallon of ethanol with only 75,000 BTU&#8217;s in it.  What can you tell us about the hydrogen energy input requirement (is it upside down like ethanol?) and what pollution is created in generating a unit of hydrogen for cars?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Waldman</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2009/04/15/driving-hydrogen-fuel-cell-vehicles/comment-page-1/#comment-65605</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Waldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/?p=338#comment-65605</guid>
		<description>David,

I enjoy your blog - however I&#039;m not so sure about hydrogen cars -- too inefficient to get energy to the hydrogen stage. Great efficiency once you have hydrogen but tough to get there.  The best way to think of hydrogen is as a &quot;battery&quot; that you have to regularly charge (fillup).  This is quite useful - but just like batteries vs electrical outlet, you pay for the convenience of batteries.

Electric cars do make sense given the right infrastructure.  Shai Agassi&#039;s BetterPlace is one example.

Thanks
Karl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I enjoy your blog &#8211; however I&#8217;m not so sure about hydrogen cars &#8212; too inefficient to get energy to the hydrogen stage. Great efficiency once you have hydrogen but tough to get there.  The best way to think of hydrogen is as a &#8220;battery&#8221; that you have to regularly charge (fillup).  This is quite useful &#8211; but just like batteries vs electrical outlet, you pay for the convenience of batteries.</p>
<p>Electric cars do make sense given the right infrastructure.  Shai Agassi&#8217;s BetterPlace is one example.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Karl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

