<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future of Energy &#8211; $100 a Barrel Oil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/</link>
	<description>A Future Look at Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:38:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-53382</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/#comment-53382</guid>
		<description>Hi,What a great way to get the populas united,oil prices effect us all,notice the  global warming push,when the most amount of people believe it thru constant diet it becomes fact,whats next one world government,mark of the beast system,oil wars?are the big boys planning there agenders,trying to keep a step ahead,Derek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,What a great way to get the populas united,oil prices effect us all,notice the  global warming push,when the most amount of people believe it thru constant diet it becomes fact,whats next one world government,mark of the beast system,oil wars?are the big boys planning there agenders,trying to keep a step ahead,Derek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Cobb</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-37434</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/#comment-37434</guid>
		<description>David--Didn&#039;t take long for your prediction re: $100 oil to come true. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119932015772763671.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news

Here&#039;s hoping we make some significant strides towards &quot;...the substantial replacement on a global level of oil with renewable energy ...&quot; in 2008.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David&#8211;Didn&#8217;t take long for your prediction re: $100 oil to come true. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119932015772763671.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119932015772763671.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping we make some significant strides towards &#8220;&#8230;the substantial replacement on a global level of oil with renewable energy &#8230;&#8221; in 2008.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Stabler</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-26156</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Stabler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/#comment-26156</guid>
		<description>I would think that those who are concerned with manmade global warming would be celebrating the comming of $100 a barrel oil.  The resulting higher gas prices should reduce use and cut carbon dioxide emissions.  It is really inconsistant and illogical for anyone to complain about co2 caused warming and higher fuel prices at the same time.  The real benefit of higher oil prices is increased development of alternative fuels.  Bio-fuels are getting a real push and an ability to compete.  The rising oil price has allowed Canada, the country that supplies the US with the largest percentage of imported oil, to rapidly expanded its oil production from tar sands and it may in the near future produce more oil from tar sands than from conventional petroleum sources.  Certainly there are some economic hardships from the rising prices, but there are positive aspects that should not be overlooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that those who are concerned with manmade global warming would be celebrating the comming of $100 a barrel oil.  The resulting higher gas prices should reduce use and cut carbon dioxide emissions.  It is really inconsistant and illogical for anyone to complain about co2 caused warming and higher fuel prices at the same time.  The real benefit of higher oil prices is increased development of alternative fuels.  Bio-fuels are getting a real push and an ability to compete.  The rising oil price has allowed Canada, the country that supplies the US with the largest percentage of imported oil, to rapidly expanded its oil production from tar sands and it may in the near future produce more oil from tar sands than from conventional petroleum sources.  Certainly there are some economic hardships from the rising prices, but there are positive aspects that should not be overlooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $100 a Barrel Oil</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-25664</link>
		<dc:creator>$100 a Barrel Oil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/#comment-25664</guid>
		<description>[...] CBC Radio 3: Breaking New Sound wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt There is no question in my mind but that oil will rise to at least $100 a barrel within the next two years. It is easy to see a scenario of $125 a barrel price in the same time frame. The triple digit price of oil will become the norm. Recently it has been trading in the $80-90 range, and as it approached the upper end of that range the media began again covering the story with â€œsky is fallingâ€ concern about what this might mean for the economy. This reminded me of the comment that James Schles [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CBC Radio 3: Breaking New Sound wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt There is no question in my mind but that oil will rise to at least $100 a barrel within the next two years. It is easy to see a scenario of $125 a barrel price in the same time frame. The triple digit price of oil will become the norm. Recently it has been trading in the $80-90 range, and as it approached the upper end of that range the media began again covering the story with â€œsky is fallingâ€ concern about what this might mean for the economy. This reminded me of the comment that James Schles [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-24476</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionshift.com/blog/2007/10/23/100-a-barrel-oil/#comment-24476</guid>
		<description>David-
Think about what high speed trains between New York City and Montreal and New York City and Toronto could do to revitalize upstate New York!
We need a gradual increase on gasoline tax to $2 - $3/gallon to support 21st Century infrastructure.  Better that the incremental cost of gas goes to the US government than the producers!  Rebates could go to those unable to afford the tax, and infrastructure improvements would lower demand.
-David Fox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David-<br />
Think about what high speed trains between New York City and Montreal and New York City and Toronto could do to revitalize upstate New York!<br />
We need a gradual increase on gasoline tax to $2 &#8211; $3/gallon to support 21st Century infrastructure.  Better that the incremental cost of gas goes to the US government than the producers!  Rebates could go to those unable to afford the tax, and infrastructure improvements would lower demand.<br />
-David Fox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

